Files
english/.opencode/skills/backend-development/references/backend-performance.md
2026-04-12 01:06:31 +07:00

398 lines
9.4 KiB
Markdown

# Backend Performance & Scalability
Performance optimization strategies, caching patterns, and scalability best practices (2025).
## Database Performance
### Query Optimization
#### Indexing Strategies
**Impact:** 30% disk I/O reduction, 10-100x query speedup
```sql
-- Create index on frequently queried columns
CREATE INDEX idx_users_email ON users(email);
CREATE INDEX idx_orders_user_id ON orders(user_id);
-- Composite index for multi-column queries
CREATE INDEX idx_orders_user_date ON orders(user_id, created_at DESC);
-- Partial index for filtered queries
CREATE INDEX idx_active_users ON users(email) WHERE active = true;
-- Analyze query performance
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM orders
WHERE user_id = 123 AND created_at > '2025-01-01';
```
**Index Types:**
- **B-tree** - Default, general-purpose (equality, range queries)
- **Hash** - Fast equality lookups, no range queries
- **GIN** - Full-text search, JSONB queries
- **GiST** - Geospatial queries, range types
**When NOT to Index:**
- Small tables (<1000 rows)
- Frequently updated columns
- Low-cardinality columns (e.g., boolean with 2 values)
### Connection Pooling
**Impact:** 5-10x performance improvement
```typescript
// PostgreSQL with pg-pool
import { Pool } from 'pg';
const pool = new Pool({
host: process.env.DB_HOST,
database: process.env.DB_NAME,
user: process.env.DB_USER,
password: process.env.DB_PASSWORD,
max: 20, // Maximum connections
min: 5, // Minimum connections
idleTimeoutMillis: 30000, // Close idle connections after 30s
connectionTimeoutMillis: 2000, // Error if can't connect in 2s
});
// Use pool for queries
const result = await pool.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1', [userId]);
```
**Recommended Pool Sizes:**
- **Web servers:** `connections = (core_count * 2) + effective_spindle_count`
- **Typical:** 20-30 connections per app instance
- **Monitor:** Connection saturation in production
### N+1 Query Problem
**Bad: N+1 queries**
```typescript
// Fetches 1 query for posts, then N queries for authors
const posts = await Post.findAll();
for (const post of posts) {
post.author = await User.findById(post.authorId); // N queries!
}
```
**Good: Join or eager loading**
```typescript
// Single query with JOIN
const posts = await Post.findAll({
include: [{ model: User, as: 'author' }],
});
```
## Caching Strategies
### Redis Caching
**Impact:** 90% DB load reduction, 10-100x faster response
#### Cache-Aside Pattern (Lazy Loading)
```typescript
async function getUser(userId: string) {
// Try cache first
const cached = await redis.get(`user:${userId}`);
if (cached) return JSON.parse(cached);
// Cache miss - fetch from DB
const user = await db.users.findById(userId);
// Store in cache (TTL: 1 hour)
await redis.setex(`user:${userId}`, 3600, JSON.stringify(user));
return user;
}
```
#### Write-Through Pattern
```typescript
async function updateUser(userId: string, data: UpdateUserDto) {
// Update database
const user = await db.users.update(userId, data);
// Update cache immediately
await redis.setex(`user:${userId}`, 3600, JSON.stringify(user));
return user;
}
```
#### Cache Invalidation
```typescript
// Invalidate on update
async function deleteUser(userId: string) {
await db.users.delete(userId);
await redis.del(`user:${userId}`);
await redis.del(`user:${userId}:posts`); // Invalidate related caches
}
// Pattern-based invalidation
await redis.keys('user:*').then(keys => redis.del(...keys));
```
### Cache Layers
```
Client
→ CDN Cache (static assets, 50%+ latency reduction)
→ API Gateway Cache (public endpoints)
→ Application Cache (Redis)
→ Database Query Cache
→ Database
```
### Cache Best Practices
1. **Cache frequently accessed data** - User profiles, config, product catalogs
2. **Set appropriate TTL** - Balance freshness vs performance
3. **Invalidate on write** - Keep cache consistent
4. **Use cache keys wisely** - `resource:id:attribute` pattern
5. **Monitor hit rates** - Target >80% hit rate
## Load Balancing
### Algorithms
**Round Robin** - Distribute evenly across servers
```nginx
upstream backend {
server backend1.example.com;
server backend2.example.com;
server backend3.example.com;
}
```
**Least Connections** - Route to server with fewest connections
```nginx
upstream backend {
least_conn;
server backend1.example.com;
server backend2.example.com;
}
```
**IP Hash** - Same client → same server (session affinity)
```nginx
upstream backend {
ip_hash;
server backend1.example.com;
server backend2.example.com;
}
```
### Health Checks
```typescript
// Express health check endpoint
app.get('/health', async (req, res) => {
const checks = {
uptime: process.uptime(),
timestamp: Date.now(),
database: await checkDatabase(),
redis: await checkRedis(),
memory: process.memoryUsage(),
};
const isHealthy = checks.database && checks.redis;
res.status(isHealthy ? 200 : 503).json(checks);
});
```
## Asynchronous Processing
### Message Queues for Long-Running Tasks
```typescript
// Producer - Add job to queue
import Queue from 'bull';
const emailQueue = new Queue('email', {
redis: { host: 'localhost', port: 6379 },
});
await emailQueue.add('send-welcome', {
userId: user.id,
email: user.email,
});
// Consumer - Process jobs
emailQueue.process('send-welcome', async (job) => {
await sendWelcomeEmail(job.data.email);
});
```
**Use Cases:**
- Email sending
- Image/video processing
- Report generation
- Data export
- Webhook delivery
## CDN (Content Delivery Network)
**Impact:** 50%+ latency reduction for global users
### Configuration
```typescript
// Cache-Control headers
res.setHeader('Cache-Control', 'public, max-age=31536000, immutable'); // Static assets
res.setHeader('Cache-Control', 'public, max-age=3600'); // API responses
res.setHeader('Cache-Control', 'private, no-cache'); // User-specific data
```
**CDN Providers:**
- Cloudflare (generous free tier, global coverage)
- AWS CloudFront (AWS integration)
- Fastly (real-time purging)
## Horizontal vs Vertical Scaling
### Horizontal Scaling (Scale Out)
**Pros:**
- Better fault tolerance
- Unlimited scaling potential
- Cost-effective (commodity hardware)
**Cons:**
- Complex architecture
- Data consistency challenges
- Network overhead
**When to use:** High traffic, need redundancy, stateless applications
### Vertical Scaling (Scale Up)
**Pros:**
- Simple architecture
- No code changes needed
- Easier data consistency
**Cons:**
- Hardware limits
- Single point of failure
- Expensive at high end
**When to use:** Monolithic apps, rapid scaling needed, data consistency critical
## Database Scaling Patterns
### Read Replicas
```
Primary (Write) → Replica 1 (Read)
→ Replica 2 (Read)
→ Replica 3 (Read)
```
**Implementation:**
```typescript
// Write to primary
await primaryDb.users.create(userData);
// Read from replica
const users = await replicaDb.users.findAll();
```
**Use Cases:**
- Read-heavy workloads (90%+ reads)
- Analytics queries
- Reporting dashboards
### Database Sharding
**Horizontal Partitioning** - Split data across databases
```typescript
// Shard by user ID
function getShardId(userId: string): number {
return hashCode(userId) % SHARD_COUNT;
}
const shardId = getShardId(userId);
const db = shards[shardId];
const user = await db.users.findById(userId);
```
**Sharding Strategies:**
- **Range-based:** Users 1-1M → Shard 1, 1M-2M → Shard 2
- **Hash-based:** Hash(userId) % shard_count
- **Geographic:** EU users → EU shard, US users → US shard
- **Entity-based:** Users → Shard 1, Orders → Shard 2
## Performance Monitoring
### Key Metrics
**Application:**
- Response time (p50, p95, p99)
- Throughput (requests/second)
- Error rate
- CPU/memory usage
**Database:**
- Query execution time
- Connection pool saturation
- Cache hit rate
- Slow query log
**Tools:**
- Prometheus + Grafana (metrics)
- New Relic / Datadog (APM)
- Sentry (error tracking)
- OpenTelemetry (distributed tracing)
## Performance Optimization Checklist
### Database
- [ ] Indexes on frequently queried columns
- [ ] Connection pooling configured
- [ ] N+1 queries eliminated
- [ ] Slow query log monitored
- [ ] Query execution plans analyzed
### Caching
- [ ] Redis cache for hot data
- [ ] Cache TTL configured appropriately
- [ ] Cache invalidation on writes
- [ ] CDN for static assets
- [ ] >80% cache hit rate achieved
### Application
- [ ] Async processing for long tasks
- [ ] Response compression enabled (gzip)
- [ ] Load balancing configured
- [ ] Health checks implemented
- [ ] Resource limits set (CPU, memory)
### Monitoring
- [ ] APM tool configured (New Relic/Datadog)
- [ ] Error tracking (Sentry)
- [ ] Performance dashboards (Grafana)
- [ ] Alerting on key metrics
- [ ] Distributed tracing for microservices
## Common Performance Pitfalls
1. **No caching** - Repeatedly querying same data
2. **Missing indexes** - Full table scans
3. **N+1 queries** - Fetching related data in loops
4. **Synchronous processing** - Blocking on long tasks
5. **No connection pooling** - Creating new connections per request
6. **Unbounded queries** - No LIMIT on large tables
7. **No CDN** - Serving static assets from origin
## Resources
- **PostgreSQL Performance:** https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/performance-tips.html
- **Redis Best Practices:** https://redis.io/docs/management/optimization/
- **Web Performance:** https://web.dev/performance/
- **Database Indexing:** https://use-the-index-luke.com/