Files
english/.opencode/skills/ck-plan/references/output-standards.md
2026-04-12 01:06:31 +07:00

4.8 KiB

Output Standards & Quality

Plan File Format

YAML Frontmatter (Required for plan.md)

All plan.md files MUST include YAML frontmatter at the top:

---
title: "{Brief plan title}"
description: "{One-sentence summary for card preview}"
status: pending  # pending | in-progress | completed | cancelled
priority: P2     # P1 (High) | P2 (Medium) | P3 (Low)
effort: 4h       # Estimated total effort
issue: 74        # GitHub issue number (if applicable)
branch: kai/feat/feature-name
tags: [frontend, api]  # Category tags
blockedBy: []    # Plan dirs this plan waits on (e.g., [260301-1200-auth-system])
blocks: []       # Plan dirs this plan blocks (e.g., [260228-0900-user-dashboard])
created: 2025-12-16
---

Auto-Population Rules

When creating plans, auto-populate these fields:

  • title: Extract from task description
  • description: First sentence of Overview section
  • status: Always pending for new plans
  • priority: From user request or default P2
  • effort: Sum of phase estimates
  • issue: Parse from branch name or context
  • branch: Current git branch (git branch --show-current)
  • tags: Infer from task keywords (e.g., frontend, backend, api, auth)
  • blockedBy: Detected during pre-creation scan (empty [] if none)
  • blocks: Detected during pre-creation scan (empty [] if none)
  • created: Today's date in YYYY-MM-DD format

Use these predefined tags for consistency:

  • Type: feature, bugfix, refactor, docs, infra
  • Domain: frontend, backend, database, api, auth
  • Scope: critical, tech-debt, experimental

Task Naming Conventions

subject (imperative): Action verb + deliverable, <60 chars Examples: "Setup database migrations", "Implement OAuth2 flow"

activeForm (continuous): Present participle of subject Examples: "Setting up database", "Implementing OAuth2"

description: 1-2 sentences, concrete deliverables, reference phase file

See task-management.md for full TaskCreate patterns and metadata.

Task Breakdown

  • Transform complex requirements into manageable, actionable tasks
  • Each task independently executable with clear dependencies
  • Prioritize by dependencies, risk, business value
  • Eliminate ambiguity in instructions
  • Include specific file paths for all modifications
  • Provide clear acceptance criteria per task

File Management

List affected files with:

  • Full paths (not relative)
  • Action type (modify/create/delete)
  • Brief change description
  • Dependencies on other changes
  • Fully respect the ./docs/development-rules.md file.

Workflow Process

  1. Initial Analysis → Read docs, understand context
  2. Research Phase → Spawn researchers in parallel, investigate approaches
  3. Synthesis → Analyze reports, identify optimal solution
  4. Design Phase → Create architecture, implementation design
  5. Plan Documentation → Write comprehensive plan in Markdown
  6. Review & Refine → Ensure completeness, clarity, actionability

Output Requirements

What Planners Do

  • Create plans ONLY (no implementation)
  • Provide plan file path and summary
  • Self-contained plans with necessary context
  • Code snippets/pseudocode when clarifying
  • Multiple options with trade-offs when appropriate
  • Fully respect the ./docs/development-rules.md file.

Writing Style

IMPORTANT: Sacrifice grammar for concision

  • Focus clarity over eloquence
  • Use bullets and lists
  • Short sentences
  • Remove unnecessary words
  • Prioritize actionable info

Unresolved Questions

IMPORTANT: Use AskUserQuestion to ask users for unresolved questions at the end

  • Questions needing clarification
  • Technical decisions requiring input
  • Unknowns impacting implementation
  • Trade-offs requiring business decisions Revise the plan and phases based on the answers.

Quality Standards

Thoroughness

  • Thorough and specific in research/planning
  • Consider edge cases, failure modes
  • Think through entire user journey
  • Document all assumptions

Maintainability

  • Consider long-term maintainability
  • Design for future modifications
  • Document decision rationale
  • Avoid over-engineering
  • Fully respect the ./docs/development-rules.md file.

Research Depth

  • When uncertain, research more
  • Multiple options with clear trade-offs
  • Validate against best practices
  • Consider industry standards

Security & Performance

  • Address all security concerns
  • Identify performance implications
  • Plan for scalability
  • Consider resource constraints

Implementability

  • Detailed enough for junior developers
  • Validate against existing patterns
  • Ensure codebase standards consistency
  • Provide clear examples

Remember: Plan quality determines implementation success. Be comprehensive, consider all solution aspects.