Files
english/.opencode/skills/cook/references/review-cycle.md
2026-04-12 01:06:31 +07:00

2.8 KiB

Code Review Cycle

Interactive review-fix cycle used in code workflows.

Interactive Cycle (max 3 cycles)

cycle = 0
LOOP:
  1. Run code-reviewer → score, critical_count, warnings, suggestions

  2. DISPLAY FINDINGS:
     ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
     │ Code Review Results: [score]/10         │
     ├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
     │ Summary: [what implemented], tests      │
     │ [X/X passed]                            │
     ├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
     │ Critical Issues ([N]): MUST FIX         │
     │  - [issue] at [file:line]               │
     │ Warnings ([N]): SHOULD FIX              │
     │  - [issue] at [file:line]               │
     │ Suggestions ([N]): NICE TO HAVE         │
     │  - [suggestion]                         │
     └─────────────────────────────────────────┘

  3. AskUserQuestion (header: "Review & Approve"):
     IF critical_count > 0:
       - "Fix critical issues" → fix, re-run tester, cycle++, LOOP
       - "Fix all issues" → fix all, re-run tester, cycle++, LOOP
       - "Approve anyway" → PROCEED
       - "Abort" → stop
     ELSE:
       - "Approve" → PROCEED
       - "Fix warnings/suggestions" → fix, cycle++, LOOP
       - "Abort" → stop

  4. IF cycle >= 3 AND user selects fix:
     → "⚠ 3 review cycles completed. Final decision required."
     → AskUserQuestion: "Approve with noted issues" / "Abort workflow"

Auto-Handling Cycle (for auto modes)

cycle = 0
LOOP:
  1. Run code-reviewer → score, critical_count, warnings

  2. IF score >= 9.5 AND critical_count == 0:
     → Auto-approve, PROCEED

  3. ELSE IF critical_count > 0 AND cycle < 3:
     → Auto-fix critical issues
     → Re-run tester
     → cycle++, LOOP

  4. ELSE IF critical_count > 0 AND cycle >= 3:
     → ESCALATE TO USER

  5. ELSE (no critical, score < 9.5):
     → Approve with warnings logged, PROCEED

Critical Issues Definition

  • Security: XSS, SQL injection, OWASP vulnerabilities
  • Performance: bottlenecks, inefficient algorithms
  • Architecture: violations of patterns, coupling
  • Principles: YAGNI, KISS, DRY violations

Output Formats

  • Waiting: ⏸ Step 4: Code reviewed - [score]/10 - WAITING for approval
  • After fix: ✓ Step 4: [old]/10 → Fixed [N] issues → [new]/10 - Approved
  • Auto-approved: ✓ Step 4: Code reviewed - 9.8/10 - Auto-approved
  • Approved: ✓ Step 4: Code reviewed - [score]/10 - User approved